Fani Willis subject to local ethics board oversight: Fulton County Commissioners

by | Apr 23, 2024

The stage was set this week for ethics complaints to be addressed against District Attorney Fani Willis after County Commissioners clarified that elected officials receiving county funds are regarded as employees of the county.

In a 4–2 vote, with one abstention, on April 17, the commissioners appeared to pave the way for the Fulton County Ethics Board to consider complaints against Ms. Willis, whose office is partially funded by taxpayer dollars. Previously, the ethics board dismissed two complaints against Ms. Willis, citing her status as a state officer and asserting that the county lacked jurisdiction over her.

A complaint filed by Holly Kesler, Georgia state director for Citizens Defending Freedom, is still pending before the ethics board. Ms. Kesler, who addressed the commissioners on April 10, submitted a letter asserting the county's authority to oversee the expenditure of taxpayer money.

Two prior complaints, filed by Fulton County residents Steven Kramer and Gregory Mantell, were dismissed. They initiated independent investigations into the district attorney’s finances following allegations of misconduct becoming public.

Ms. Kesler argued that the district attorney's submission of ethics disclosure forms to the county ethics board demonstrated an acknowledgment of oversight. She pointed out that county ethics rules prohibit the county from entering into any contract involving services or property with an officer or employee, or with a person or business in which an officer or employee has an interest.

Ms. Kesler submitted an ethics complaint against Ms. Willis on March 26 regarding contracts with Mr. Wade but has not yet received a hearing date from the ethics board. At the April 17 commissioner meeting, County Attorney Soo Jo stated that the clarification would be applied “prospectively,” meaning it would take effect from the point of enactment forward.

Ms. Kesler’s complaint alleged that Ms. Willis knew or should have known that her conduct was unethical and unlawful, especially as an attorney prosecuting crimes involving public corruption.

Source: The Epoch Times

 

 

Top News

French Authorities Escalate Criminal Probe Into Elon Musk, X

French Authorities Escalate Criminal Probe Into Elon Musk, X

French cybercrime prosecutors have expanded an investigation into Elon Musk and social media platform X into a criminal probe, according to the Paris prosecutor’s office.   Musk and former X CEO Linda Yaccarino were reportedly summoned by French authorities for...

President Trump Announces Three-Day Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire

President Trump Announces Three-Day Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire

President Trump announced Thursday that Russia and Ukraine have agreed to a three-day ceasefire from May 9 through May 11, which will include a halt to “all kinetic activity” and a prisoner exchange involving 1,000 prisoners from each country.   Trump said the...

Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Redistricting Referendum

Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Redistricting Referendum

The Virginia Supreme Court has struck down the state’s redistricting referendum, dealing a blow to Democrats who had backed the measure as a way to gain additional U.S. House seats.   The proposal passed by about three points in late April and was seen at the...

Federal Trade Court Blocks Trump’s New Global Tariff Plan

Federal Trade Court Blocks Trump’s New Global Tariff Plan

The Court of International Trade on Thursday blocked President Trump’s second major global tariff plan, months after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that he could not unilaterally impose broad tariffs under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act.   Following...